Data High quality Research
The fresh new imply research quality score across the 41 posts conference introduction requirements try six.2 (eTables step one and you will dos regarding the Enhance). Several studies (4.9%) fell regarding the lower-top quality diversity, and you may 10 knowledge (24.4%) was indeed throughout the moderate-quality range, towards the remaining 29 knowledge (70.7%) regarding highest-high quality diversity. The two education deemed getting lower methodological quality was basically removed out of analyses. Hence, the remaining 39 knowledge were used in next meta-analyses.
Take to Characteristics out-of Provided Training
All in all, 39 knowledge fulfilled most of the studies and you will methodological introduction standards. Degree was indeed available for delivering (n = 34), getting (n = 20), forwarding instead of agree (n = 5), or which have good sext sent rather than concur (letter = 4). The Desk summarizes included degree. Altogether along side 39 knowledge, 110 380 users was provided, with an indicate period of ages (age groups, eleven.9-17.0 ages). An average of, 47.2% away from users was basically male. Twenty-two training (56.4%) had been throughout the United states, several training (31.8%) was indeed away from Europe, 2 studies (5.1%) was in fact of Australian continent, step 1 data (2.6%) try regarding Canada, step one analysis (dos.6%) are off Southern Africa (2.6%), and you can step 1 analysis (2.6%) is off Southern Korea. To try to get degree (46.2%) checked-out sexting using smartphones and you may computers, having 6 knowledge (fifteen.4%) using computers only, fourteen studies (35.9%) through cell phones merely, and another studies (2.6%) bringing shortage of advice to possess devotion. 11 degree (28.2%) requested professionals regarding the sexting through photos, 14 training (thirty-five.9%) thru photos otherwise video clips, 7 education (17.9%) thru photo and you can/or explicit texts, and you may eight training (17.9%) thru pictures, films, and/otherwise explicit messages. Finally, 30 studies (79.5%) was typed from inside the peer-examined guides, and you may 8 degree (20.5%) had been unpublished.
Desk.
Abbreviations: Each other, investigation centers on sexting via possibly a smart phone and/or internet; FW-P, investigation targets whether participants common others’ sexts mundo real de citas vs en lГnea in the place of the concur; FW-V, analysis targets whether respondents had sexts shared with anybody else rather than the concur; Yards, sexually specific messages; Cellular, analysis is targeted on sexting via mobile phones; NCPTUP, National Campaign to stop Teen and you may Unexpected Pregnancy; On the web, data is targeted on sexting over the internet; P, pictures; Roentgen, research focuses on choosing messages; S, research concentrates on sending messages; Unspecified, investigation doesn’t give sufficient suggestions to determine the form from sexting; V, video clips.
Combined Incidence out of Delivering a beneficial Sext
The random-effects analysis of the 34 studies on sending a sext yielded a mean prevalence of 14.8% (95% CI, 12.8%-16.8%) ( Figure 2 ). The Egger test provided evidence that studies with smaller sample sizes had more extreme prevalence estimates (eFigure 1 in the Supplement). A sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the presence of potential outliers, and one study was identified. Heterogeneity of effect sizes remained present with (Q = , P < .001,>
Forest Area of the Impression Sizes for every single Data Included in the Meta-analysis into Prevalence off Sending a great Sext
Shown try a tree spot from degree included in the meta-data. The overall realization guess to have sending a beneficial sext is actually fourteen.8% (95% CI, a dozen.8%-sixteen.8%). NCPTUP means Federal Promotion to prevent Teenager and you may Unplanned Pregnancy.
An excellent meta-regression study revealed a good linear rise in incidence because years increased (b = 0.037; 95% CI, 0.024-0.050). Perception sizes was basically and moderated by the 12 months out-of investigation study range, with a confirmed upsurge in the latest incidence off delivering good sext over the years (b = 0.026; 95% CI, 0.012-0.039). Chatting retailer plus explained anywhere between-investigation variability, which have increased frequency out of sexting into the cell phones (k = thirteen; 13.4%; 95% CI, 9.0%-17.7%) in contrast to hosts (k = 4; 5.5%; 95% CI, dos.3%-8.6%), where k ways just how many knowledge. Incidence wasn’t moderated by the intercourse, geographic place, content blogs, otherwise guide position.