Even though there is consistent and you can convergent scientific literary works towards connection concept additionally the positive and negative reactions that safe and you may vulnerable styles, correspondingly, end up in during the wedded life, no education was indeed learned that concurrently examined new variables stated when you look at the this research, proving those that dichotomously discriminate the fresh attachment style together with the new magnitude out-of discrimination. Distinguishing the group off factors one to characterizes each of the accessory looks and you can demonstrating and therefore factors have the finest fuel of discrimination would be another influence that can point out research and input agendas having few therapy.
Contained in this experience, the goal of this study were to determine perhaps the communications, relationship variations, solution, regularity and you will intensity of conflicts variables carry out discriminate people who have secure and vulnerable accessory from inside the heterosexual dating. Thus, brand new theory examined try that negative correspondence, measures off assault and you may protection, frequency and you will concentration of disputes parameters do define men and women because individuals with vulnerable connection, and also the unlock telecommunications, consensus, satisfaction, cohesion and you can marital improvement, and contract variables carry out define them because the people with safer connection styles.
Professionals
This is certainly a decimal, cross-sectional analysis that utilizes a descriptive and you will explanatory framework. Minimal ages of men applicants was 20 as well as the maximum is actually 79 (M = ; SD = ). Minimal period of females participants is 18 additionally the limit is actually 76 (Yards = ; SD = ) ( Dining table step 1).
Tool
1) Sociodemographic survey: The brand new questionnaire of sociodemographic services of the members is sent out due to a questionnaire with 14 inquiries that examined: ages, intimate direction, place of household, relationship condition, length of latest dating, lives regarding a previous relationships, length of earlier dating, degree, functioning outside the household, work, private income, amount of youngsters and you will religion.
2) Experience in Close Relationship – Reduced Divorced dating apps (ECR-R-Brazil) ( Natividade Shiramizu, 2015 Natividade, J. C., Shiramizu, V. K. M. (2015). Uma medida de apego: versao brasileira da Experiences in Close Relationship Scale-Reduzida (ECR-R-Brasil). Psicologia USP, 26(3), 484-494. ): The scale assesses the anxiety and avoidance of attachment factors in the marital relationship. The ECR-R-Brazil has affirmative phrases that respondents must categorize on a seven-point Likert scale that ranges from “strongly agree” to seven “strongly disagree”. The scale has ten items, five on the anxiety factor and five on the avoidance factor. In the analysis of the main components of the items of the ECR-R-Brazil carried out in the study by Natividade and Shiramizu (2015) Natividade, J. C., Shiramizu, V. K. M. (2015). Uma medida de apego: versao brasileira da Experiences in Close Relationship Scale-Reduzida (ECR-R-Brasil). Psicologia USP, 26(3), 484-494. , with good data adequacy, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) = 0.80; Bartlett’s sphericity test, ? 2 (66, N = 4.879) = ; p < 0.001. The final model from the confirmatory factor analysis showed an optimal fit, as pointed out in the study: ? 2 = 101.8; Degrees of freedom (df) = 25; p = < 0.001; ? 2 /df = 4.07; Goodness-of-Fit Index (GFI) = 0990; Adjusted Goodness-of-Fit Index (AGFI) = 0.990; Normed Fit Index (NFI) = 0.990; Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.990; Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.990; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.025; Confidence Interval (CI) = 90%. In this study, the ECR-R-Brazil had a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.64 for men and 0.57 for women.
3) Mosmann, C., Wagner, A good., Sarriera, J. (2008). A good qualidade conjugal como preditora 2 estilos educativos parentais. Revista Psicologia Lisboa, 22(2), 161-182. Recuperado de ): The newest conflict scale is put into several subscales: in the first, called “conflict-disagreement”, 9 items are shown and really should feel examined to your a half dozen-point Likert scale regarding the regularity with which the causes having dispute shown occurred in the last seasons, between “almost never” so you can half dozen “every date”. Regarding next subscale, called “conflict-aggression”, about three items are shown speaking about the fresh new intensity of issues, these must be examined on a Likert measure of five circumstances ranging from “never” to four “always”. Regarding analysis so you can adjust the size regarding English to help you Portuguese, good Cronbach’s Leader of 0.71 is actually located. Contained in this studies, Cronbach’s thinking have been 0.80 for males and you will 0.77 for women.