Hollitscher never shown a quarrel that would lead, step by step, regarding positivism so you’re able to reality and then he might have thought about the new shot to create instance a disagreement because philosophical folly. He alternatively created the realist updates itself, represented they because of the instances of technology and you will sound judgment, demonstrated how directly it was regarding medical lookup and everyday step and so shown its strength. (SFS, p. 113).
step three.2 Very early Experience of Wittgenstein (1948–1952)
Feyerabend’s principal intellectual involvement from the later 1940s and early 1950s was a student in his capacity just like the beginner chief of one’s “Kraft Network”. Viktor Kraft is an old person in the fresh Vienna Community, and became Feyerabend’s dissertation manager. The fresh new Kraft Network is a strategy club centred up to Kraft, and that constituted another part of the Austrian University Neighborhood. Bela Juhos, Walter Hollitscher, Georg Henrik von Wright, Elizabeth Anscombe and Wittgenstein were all the seeing speakers. Feyerabend profile the Network kept conferences out of 1949 so you can 1952 otherwise 1953 (SFS, p. 109), which they set by themselves the work out-of “considering philosophical trouble from inside the a beneficial nonmetaphysical manner in accordance with unique site towards the findings of one’s sciences” (“Herbert Feigl: A Biographical Design”, for the P. K.Feyerabend & Grams.Maxwell (eds.), Brain, Count, and you will Means: Essays inside Opinions and Research in honor of Herbert Feigl, (Minneapolis: College or university off Minnesota Push, 1966), pp. 1–2) and therefore their main topics of talk had been the questions out of the reality out of theoretical entities as well as the fresh “external globe”. Throughout the Wittgenstein’s lecture, Feyerabend recalls next:
Not really a short and you will very interesting go to of the Wittgenstein himself (inside the 1952) you will advance our very own dialogue. Wittgenstein try breathtaking in his way of to provide real cases, such as for instance amoebas around good microscope… but once he left i nonetheless did not understand if or not or perhaps not there was an outward community, or, in the event the there’s one, just what arguments was in fact in preference of it. (Feyerabend & Maxwell ibid., p. 4. Observe that Feyerabend need to have had this new go out incorrect, since Wittgenstein died from inside the April 1951).
Feyerabend in the course of time build this type of opinion when you look at the an interesting number of papers while it began with 1957, arguing you to definitely technology needs reality to help you advances, and that positivism manage stultify including advances
Wittgenstein, who took a long time and also make upwards his brain and following checked more an hour or so later gave a beneficial competing abilities and you can seemed to like all of our disrespectful thoughts toward fawning appreciation the guy discovered in other places. (SFS, p. 109).
Into the 1949, Feyerabend is introduced in order to Bertolt Brecht, and Hollitscher considering him the ability to getting certainly Brecht’s manufacturing personnel, but he became it off, later discussing so it as one of the most significant errors of their life (SFS, p. 114). On the autobiography, although not, the guy folds that it declaration, proclaiming that however not have appreciated being part of the directly knit class one to surrounded Brecht. (The reasons for their afterwards defection regarding Popperian camp hunt to possess started equivalent).
New College away from Vienna’s physicists was indeed Hans Thirring, Karl Przibram, and Felix Ehrenhaft. Feyerabend respected Thirring and you may Ehrenhaft, and you may was dependent on Ehrenhaft, that has lectured to your physics around of 1947. Ehrenhaft are also known as a brutal and you may independent critic of the many categories of orthodoxy inside physics, however, are both regarded as a charlatan. Feyerabend records he and his fellow science people looked forward so you’re able to adding your given that a scam, in truth have been handled, on 1949 Alpbach summit, to a battle anywhere between Ehrenhaft additionally the orthodox the spot where the previous shown their studies however the second defended their condition gay hookup Jacksonville by the playing with tips and that Galileo’s competitors would have been proud of, ridiculing Ehrenhaft’s phenomena as simple Dreckeffects. Feyerabend stated that “Just far after performed Ehrenhaft’s training drain into the and you may our very own ideas at that time and the emotions of entire community considering myself following which have an effective example of the sort off scientific rationality” (SFS, p. 111). Ehrenhaft don’t convince new theoreticians, just who safe themselves with an iron-curtain from dogmatic trust out of alike kind because you to implemented because of the Galileo’s competitors. Their audience remained staunch empiricists, never denying you to definitely research had to be adapted to help you facts. Feyerabend stated that the big date-to-date team off research, what Thomas Kuhn titled “normal technology”, cannot can be found in the place of this “split up consciousness”.